Our sugya addresses the issue of a Mazik owned by a חרש שוטה או קטן. The owner of the Mazik is not liable for damages, but Beid Did will appoint an agent to supervise the animal - as we discussed in the previous shiur. If the animal has been establishes as a מועד, the compensation fees will be collected from either the agent or the properties of the young orphan. Does this apply to a שור תם as well? Other issues includ: what level of שמירה must be provided in the cases of Tam & Muad? Does the original 1/2 Nezek still apply under the regulations that govern a Tam even when the animal becomes a Muad? We will study the case of a שואל who received an animal under the false premise that it is a שור תם & later discovered that the animal is a מועד
To contact us with any comments, suggestions or requests, please click here
YUTorah ® Online is made possible by the generosity of Marcos and Adina Katz and is coordinated by Yeshiva University's Center for the Jewish Future . It offers more than 240,000 shiurim via webcast in audio, video and text formats by our Roshei Yeshiva and other YU luminaries. The opinions and views expressed are solely those of the author or lecturer and should not be attributed to Yeshiva University.
0 comments Leave a Comment