Description
We'll complete the 2nd Perek of Kiddushin (58a-b). What is the law if after the שחיטה בעזרה of Chullin he discovered that the animal was a טריפה. This means that the שחיטה is meaningless. In such a scenario Rebby Shimon agrees that there is no איסור הנאה in the Basar of the Chullin & therefore the meat can be considered valuable to the woman who received it as Kesef Kiddushin. We will study the next Mishna about a Yisrael who gives Teruma as Kesef Kiddushin. The law in this case depends upon the great debate re: טובת הנאה. The rights of the Yisrael to chose the Kohen is that deemed monetary value such that if the Mekadesh gave her Teruma the kiddushin is valid since she 'owns' the Teruma as an object of value. Finally the status of מי חטאת.
0 comments Leave a Comment