This shiur will focus on the controversy between the Rosh & the opinion quoted in the Meiri as to whether the Halacha of the Chachamim obligating the Mazik to pay damages even though he has implemented his required Harchaka applies to the Mishna of Tanur (oven) exclusively or to all the cases throughout the Perek when Harchaka is required. We will examine the thought process of the Ramban in his essay Dina DiGarmi regarding the case of the tree whose roots damage his neighbor's Bor.
To contact us with any comments, suggestions or requests, please click here
YUTorah ® Online is made possible by the generosity of Marcos and Adina Katz and is coordinated by Yeshiva University's Center for the Jewish Future . It offers more than 240,000 shiurim via webcast in audio, video and text formats by our Roshei Yeshiva and other YU luminaries. The opinions and views expressed are solely those of the author or lecturer and should not be attributed to Yeshiva University.
0 comments Leave a Comment