Description
We begin the Mishna and sugya in Masechet Ketuvot 23b-24a: Is he believed to establish his and his friend's status as a Kohen for the eating of Teruma and other rights of Kohanim? Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient, or must we require two witnesses? The sugya will review the six Mishnayos of this Chapter and analyze the need for, i.e. the Chiddush of, each of these Mishnayos. Why could we not derive one Mishna from the other? What new principles are established by each of these Mishnayos respectively?
0 comments Leave a Comment