YU Torah Banner
 

Parshas Emor - Personal Strictures on Kohanim

Author: Rabbi Avraham Gordimer
Article Date: Thursday May 07, 2009

 
    Google Facebook Twitter Digg My Space Email

Number of visits: 70  |  Number of downloads: 0

 
The first sections of Parshas Emor present special personal regulations for Kohanim pertaining to marriage and defilement (both spiritual and physical). The Torah then sets forth bodily defects (“mumim”) which disqualify Kohanim from performing Avodah (sacrificial service), and the Torah likewise states that Kohanim who are tamei (spiritually impure) may not engage in Avodah. After some discussion about the qualifications for eating Terumah, the Torah addresses various factors which invalidate animals for use as korbonos (sacrifices) and presents a few additional halachos about korbonos.

Why are Kohanim subject to special strictures of marriage and defilement? The Torah itself answers this question: “They shall be holy to their God and not defile His name, for they bring the sacrifices of Hashem their God and they must be holy.” (Vayikra 21:6)

The Torah’s answer evokes a major question: If the reason for Kohanim being bound in their personal lives by these special strictures is that they need to remain in a state of kedushah (holiness) so that they will be fit for Avodah – or that they need to need to be in a state of kedushah as a reflection of their role in Avodah – why does the Torah first present these special personal strictures of the Kohanim at the outset of the parshah and delay discussion of direct invalidations of Avodah (mumim, various forms of tumah [impurity] and invalid animals) until later in the parshah? If the whole reason for the Kohanim’s personal regulations regarding marriage and defilement is fitness for or association with Avodah, would it not make more sense for the Torah to first discuss immediate validations and invalidations for Avodah such as mumim and various forms of tumah and then later address personal regulations of Kohanim, which are only related to Avodah in a causal sense? Should not direct rules about Avodah precede personal regulations on Kohanim which were mandated merely as a result of the Kohanim’s relationship to Avodah?

The answer to this question requires readjustment of our vision of Avodah. In performing Avodah, man is not a mere functionary; on the contrary, man is the primary force in Avodah and it is because of man that Avodah has any meaning.

What is Avodah? Is it the objective, detached act of animals being slaughtered and their meat and other materials ascending the Mizbe’ach (Altar) and being burned? If one would encounter an automated korbonos system, in which there was no human involvement or initiation, would it have any meaning? Obviously not. The essence of Avodah is man’s work as he prepares and offers korbonos, which are a manifestation of his dedication and drawing close to Hashem. Korbonos are a mere vehicle, an implement, a way for man to express himself in serving God; man’s subjugation to God and burning desire to serve Him are the core and starting point of Avodah.

Thus, since Avodah is a reflection of man’s role in serving Hashem, the Torah begins Parshas Emor with personal regulations on Kohanim, for Avodah begins with man and is merely expressed by the actualization of korbonos.

Chazal (the Sages) state, “Rachmana liba ba’i” – “Hashem seeks the heart”. May we apply this lesson to our Torah learning and performance of mitzvos, such that they embody and express inner commitment of the heart and are never detached, automated acts.
 
Add Keyword Add Comment